For quite some time, many researchers and lay people alike have subscribed to what is known as the "Thrifty Genotype Theory." Basically, this theory suggests that cycles of feast and famine that occurred early in human history created a gene that assists the body in utilizing scarce nutrients.
Because we as humans no longer operate on a feast or famine eating cycle, however, this gene -- which still remains -- leads to obesity and diabetes. In addition, this theory pointed to certain ethnic groups; Native Americans, Mexican Americans, African Americans, Australian Aborigine and other indigenous groups as being genetically prone to diabetes because of their link to this particular gene.
In efforts to challenge the ethnic presumptions, and erode the "Thrifty Genotype Theory" altogether,
a study by U.S. and Australian researchers examines existing genetic studies published across a variety of disciplines. Whereas past studies into the genetic link to diabetes failed to control for outside variables, this new study factors in poverty, housing segregation and poor diet -- and, upon completion of the researchers' analysis, all were found to be stronger indicators of diabetes than genes.











1. I'm glad someone is trying to put this theory to rest, there weren't even famines during prehistoric (caveman) ages based on research from botanists, therefore the very notion of a "thifty genotype theory" is preposterous. Also, some ethnic groups more prone to insulin resistance are a reflection of successive waves of colonization and immigration, which suggests that the theory doesn't hold up as well when more closely scrutinized.
Posted at 1:42PM on Apr 18th 2007 by Scott