Based on ADA statistics, there are bout 20.8 million people in the United States who have diabetes. For you percentage people out there, that's roughly 7 percent of the total U.S. population. That figure represents the almost 15 million people who have been diagnosed and the estimated 5 to 6 million people who are not aware that they have the disease. This lack of awareness can of course lead to an increased risk for complications. But, for those individuals who are aware that they have diabetes but still do not seek regular treatment, risk of complications are also great. This is particularly true when it comes to diabetic retinopathy.
Affecting up to 24,000 new people each year, diabetic retinopathy is a degenerative disease of the retina that can sometimes lead to blindness. But, according to the American Academy of Ophthalmology, permanent blindness from retinopathy can be prevented if it is diagnosed and treated in its early stages. Because only 60 percent of people with diabetes have their eyes tested annually, many cases of blindness could be avoided if that percentage was much higher, doctors say. In fact, studies show that regular treatments, including an annual eye dilation and exam, can reduce the chance of severe vision loss by almost 94 percent. And, with more advanced treatment, such as the method highlighted in Allie's post below, we will hopefully see a day where blindness becomes a thing of the past.











1. WHY is it that only 60% of people w/Diabetes have their eye checked annually? It would be more "cost-effective" for the Public/Private sector to require ALL physicians to examine the eyes of patients that are known to have Diabetes. This as you say, would be a very positive step in combatting blindness related to Diabetes. Obviously, you cannot force a person to have his/her eyes checked for Retinopathy related to Diabetes, but the alternative in terms of the potential damage(loss of sight) can be overwhelming and avoidable if certain steps are taken within the Healthcare System REQUIRING that people w/Diabetes be contacted for "Eye Exams". This would entail a DataBase set up in each city to identify those w/Diabetes so the contacts could be made. However, the problem with this approach is that there are a number of people who resent that such a DataBase be collected. I feel that if "Loss of Sight" can be prevented, then this so-called intrusion into privacy is worthwhile. Keep in mind, that the only intrusion into privacy would be a record that identifies people who have Diabetes and who might be at risk for complications. The decision as to having one's eyes examined would still be made by the patient.
Posted at 11:30PM on Jan 10th 2007 by BetterCell